Buddhist
Art and Amida Raigo Triads
If you ever have the chance to visit the museum,
look for sculptures like this in Rooms 5-7, on the 1st Floor of the
New Exhibition Hall. This topic may seem a bit difficult,
but try to follow as best you can. It's about a certain type of
Buddhist statue. Actually this type of statue does not appear alone,
but as a set of three: in the center is a Buddha called Amida, and
on either side sits an Bodhisattva-attendant, one named Seishi and
one named Kannon. This set is called an Amida Raigo Triad.
We will talk about what raigo means later, but before we begin,
take a look at this Amida Raigo Triad from a temple called Joshoko-ji,
in the mountains north of Kyoto.

Amida Raigo Triad
Late Heian Period, 12th Century
Height: Amida Nyorai 51.3 cm
Kannon, Seishi Bosatsu 43.9 cm each
(Joshoko-ji Temple)
Paintings and Sculpture
Have you ever thought about the differences between expressing something
through painting and sculpture? Think about the special characteristics
of each medium. For example, if you want to show a person running
or walking, which medium would better depict this motion? You might
be able to make either a painting or a sculpture look quite realistic,
but the effect would inevitably be different because it is generally
much easier to express how fast your subject is moving through painting
than through sculpture. This may be due to the fact that painting
can easily include, not only the subject, but also the surrounding
environment! Think of this example: if you wanted to create an image
of Japan's Bullet Train (or Shinkansen, one of the fastest trains
in the world!), you could paint a scene of a train speeding by with
a rush of wind, or you could show the scenery speeding by around
the train. Using perspective drawing, you could create a sense of
distance. Such a scene, however, would be extremely difficult to
express through sculpture.
Let's think about an example in art of a more recent period. Both
the French Impressionist painter Degas and sculptor Rodin used dancers
as the subject of their works. While Degas' paintings emphasize
the graceful carriage and the exuberant atmosphere of the times,
however, the sculptor Rodin seems most interested in the forms and
poses of the dancers.
Raigo and Sculpture
Now that we have thought a little about the special characteristics
of painting and sculpture, let us move on to our main topic, Buddhist
sculpture.
Buddhas are considered, like God, to be an Absolute existence and
thus require no surrounding environment. Though Buddhas themselves
need no enhancement, however, their followers, such as Buddhist
angels or Bodhisattvas, sometimes are enriched with depictions of
movement or surrounding atmosphere. Here too, however, we see the
limitations of sculpture in depicting movement. On ancient Buddhist
wall paintings, angels appear to be floating lightly through the
heavens around the Buddha. But when these same kinds of angels were
incorporated in sculpture and attached to the Buddha's halo, however,
they lost their lightness and seemed to become more rigid. This
is probably because of the innate differences between painting and
sculpture.
The above may be one of the reasons that Japanese sculptors did
not often try to incorporate surrounding environment into their
sculptures. In the Heian Period, however, belief in the Pure Land
spread, and people began to believe that after death they would
be reborn in the Pure Land Paradise of Amida Buddha. As this belief
spread, so too grew the desire to see expressions of the Pure Land
in Buddhist sculpture. The result were images depicting Amida Buddha
coming down from the far-off Pure Land Paradise to meet the souls
of the dead and take them back with him to heaven. These images
are called raigo, and usually had Amida in the center with an attendant
on either side. This is the Amida Raigo Triad!
Scenes of this Amida Raigo Triad riding clouds, crossing mountains,
and flying through the wind were easy to express through the medium
of painting, but many difficulties arose when trying to express
such scenes through sculpture, such as in the triad above. Why?
Well, think about the nature of sculpture: it is impossible (or
it was in those days) to create a sculpture that floats in mid-air.
It is also difficult to express speed. To compensate, the sculptors
of the Joshoko-ji triad tried to give the attendants a sense of
tension and presence by depicting them leaning forward.
Towards the end of the Heian Period, perhaps reflecting changes
in the society as a whole, artistic expression became more realistic,
both in painting and sculpture. One area in which this can be seen
is in the Raigo sculptures. The triad above from Joshoko-ji Temple
is one of the earliest experiments in realism in a Raigo triad.
Let's compare it with a painting of the same period.

Amida Raigo
Late Heian Period
Color on silk
Yushihachimanko Juhachika-in Temple
What are the differences in the way this Bodhisattva-attendant
is portrayed in painting and in sculpture? In the painting, the
central triad and their surrounding Bodhisattva ride upon clouds,
and cross mountains rich with autumn color as they gradually make
their descent. On the other hand, though the sculpture does not
show the autumn mountains over which the triad is crossing, it does
show all three figures on clouds, and the two attendants crouched
on their knees are leaning forward, giving them the same sense of
speed and presence within an environment that we see in the painting.
In other words, what we see here are experimental sculptures that
are attempting to show the same kind of realistic expression as
in painting. Such artistic experiments were being carried out over
900 years ago!
Text by Shiro Ito, Department of Museum Research
Illustrations by Satoshi Ichida, Department of Public Relations
English Translation by Melissa M. Rinne, Department of Archives
|